Posts Tagged by TransCanada pipeline
|January 20, 2012||Posted by Beth Shaw under Issues|
Canada’s Prime Minister Steven Harper has expressed his ‘profound disappointment’ in Obama’s decision to deny permits for TransCanada’s Keystone XL Pipeline to be shared with the United States. Harper has said it seems to be best for Canada to look at diversifying. At this point Canada and the United States partner on most of the imports and exports of crude. Instead of putting all their eggs in the United States’ basket, they’ll look to China.
President Barack Obama’s decision yesterday to reject a permit for TransCanada Corp.’s Keystone XL oil pipeline may prompt Canada to turn to China for oil exports.
Prime Minister Stephen Harper, in a telephone call yesterday, told Obama “Canada will continue to work to diversify its energy exports,” according to details provided by Harper’s office. Canadian Natural Resource Minister Joe Oliver said relying less on the U.S. would help strengthen the country’s “financial security.”
The “decision by the Obama administration underlines the importance of diversifying and expanding our markets, including the growing Asian market,” Oliver told reporters in Ottawa.
Currently, 99 percent of Canada’s crude exports go to the U.S., a figure that Harper wants to reduce in his bid to make Canada a “superpower” in global energy markets.
Canada accounts for more than 90 percent of all proven reserves outside the Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries, according to data compiled in the BP Statistical Review of World Energy. Most of Canada’s crude is produced from oil-sands deposits in the landlocked province of Alberta, where output is expected to double over the next eight years, according to the Canadian Association of Petroleum Producers.
“I am sure that if the oil sands production is not used in the United States, they will be used in other countries,” Fatih Birol, chief economist at the International Energy Agency, said in an interview before a speech at Imperial College in London today.
Is Obama putting his own job security ahead of the national interest of the United States. What happens if Canada decides to build the Keystone XL Pipeline to their west coast – and on to Asia – to be refined instead of through the United States? Do the radical environmentalists really think that China will refine that oil more cleanly than the United States? Or perhaps they just will feel better about themselves that they accomplished something. But what will they and Barack Obama have accomplished?
Losing the Keystone XL Pipeline will further weaken America’s standing in the world. Tens of thousands of American jobs will be lost. The American economy will lose an excellent opportunity to help jump-start our faltering economy. Gas prices will rise. Meanwhile, Canada will develop stronger bonds with China and China’s economy and global standing will continue to grow. Ironically, whatever damage might (or might not) be done to the environment will be worse because China’s regulations are no where near as stringent as those in place in the United States.
There really isn’t an upside to losing the opportunity for the United States to participate in the Keystone XL Pipeline. Yet Obama is willing to do just that in hopes of getting the environmentalists votes for his re-election. Where is the hope and change in that?
Please help us make this madness stop before it’s too late. Sign the petition!
[FACEBOOK] http://on.fb.me/yomDu2 Sign the petition! Urge the Obama Administration to approve the Keystone XL pipeline by the February 21 deadline.
[TWITTER] Sign the petition: http://bit.ly/A8K2mV Urge #Obama to approve the #KeystoneXL pipeline by the February 21 deadline! #YesKXL
|November 15, 2011||Posted by Beth Shaw under Issues|
To not make a decision is to make a decision, as the old saying goes. Apparently a decision (via non-decision on the part of the Obama Administration) has been made that puts another nail in the coffin of American energy independence, American jobs and the American economy. The loss of the TransCanada pipeline amounts to the loss of 20,000 construction jobs. $5 billion in tax revenue and 700,000 barrels of additional oil a day. It’s like we’re just giving our country away to China.
The TransCanada Pipeline is to be rerouted due to Obama’s delays.
Delays in building the $7-billion Keystone XL pipeline project will force Canada to sell its huge oil reserves to China instead of the United States, Prime Minister Stephen Harper has bluntly warned President Barack Obama.
The White House has put off a decision on the 1,700-mile pipeline from Alberta to Texas until after the 2012 election so a study can be carried out into its impact on an environmentally sensitive area in Nebraska.
But late Monday, the company building the pipeline said it will do as the Obama administration officials requested. TransCanada announced the company will move its planned oil pipeline out of the environmentally sensitive Sandhills area of Nebraska.
Details on how they would alter the planned route were not available late Monday, but experts believe it would add another $1.7 billion to the cost.
But any delays, Canadian officials said, could mean up to 700,000 barrels of crude oil a day that would have eased the American energy crisis will be diverted to the Far East. The U.S. Chamber of Commerce estimates it will also cost 20,000 jobs.
Harper told Obama he was “disappointed” in the decision to delay the pipeline when the two leaders met face-to-face over lunch at the Asian Pacific Economic Cooperation summit in Honolulu on Sunday. The president told him the delay was necessary to get all questions properly addressed.
Before their meeting, Harper told reporters the delay had been met with “extremely negative reaction” in the United States because it was “obviously what’s in the best interests of not just of the Canadian economy but also the American economy.”
But he blamed election year politics for the impasse. “This is simply the political season in the United States and decisions are being made for domestic political reasons that often have little or nothing to do with what other countries may think” said the Conservative party prime minister.
Canada’s National Resources Minister Joe Oliver said the decision will be costly for TransCanada Corp. the Calgary-based company behind the project.
“If it’s delayed too long then the project could fall off,” said Oliver. “The economic viability of any project could be undermined by excessive delay,” he added, saying the delay “wasn’t helpful.”
Oliver said he had just returned from a trip to China and Japan. “There’s a keen interest in our resources in both those countries,” he said. “The Japanese are interested in our natural gas, the Chinese in our oil and gas.
“Basically all of our energy exports are currently going to the United States. We have one customer, so it is a major fundamental strategic objective of Canada to diversify our customer base.”
Jim Flaherty, the country’s finance minister, also warned that China could get the oil that was expected to come to the States. “We’ve got to go where the trade is,” he warned. “We have great friends in the Asia-Pacific community and this is a tremendous opportunity in the long-term and medium-term for Canada.
“The sooner we can increasingly access markets in Asia the better,” added Flaherty, who said the delay would also hurt the United States as it would cost “thousands and thousands of high-paying, largely union jobs.”
U.S. Chamber of Commerce president Thomas Donohue echoed that view. “This is clearly a political decision and everyone knows it,” he said. “Unfortunately it will immediately cost more than 20,000 Americans an opportunity to get a job working on the pipeline and hundreds of thousands more jobs in the future.
“Politics has trumped jobs in this decision and we can only wonder if the administration’s delay will cause Canada to turn their pipeline west and ship their energy and American jobs elsewhere.”
Donohue said the State Department – which has jurisdiction as the pipeline crosses an international border – has already studied 13 different routes and decided the one through Nebraska was the best.
“The decision to delay the pipeline permit sends a signal to all Americans that even in the face of sustained high unemployment and instability overseas, jobs and energy security are not a priority,” Donohue said.
The Keystone XL pipeline would run from Hardisty, Alberta to Nebraska where it would meet up with an existing pipeline which would take the oil to Cushing, Okla. A second new segment would take the oil on to Houston and Port Arthur, Tex.
But the first section passes over the Ogallala Aquifer, a vast, shallow water table that yields nearly one-third of the nation’s irrigation, as well as tap water for huge portions of Nebraska and parts of South Dakota, Wyoming, Colorado, Kansas, Oklahoma, New Mexico and Texas.
Critics, including politicians on both sides of the fence in Nebraska, say the route of the pipeline would present an unacceptable risk as a spill could contaminate the aquifer. Nebraska’s Republican Gov. Dave Heineman proposed an alternative route which would add an estimated $1.7 billion to the cost of constructing the pipeline.
The Nebraska Legislature was meeting late on Monday to decide its next move.
An initial environmental impact study found the pipeline would not have a significant effect, but the State Department announced in early November that it was investigating whether an alternative route can be found.
Canada now has the third-largest deposits of extractable oil in the world after Saudi Arabia and Venezuela. It is already the biggest supplier of American oil and is preferred over most other exporters because of the closeness to the United States and the long-standing friendship between the two countries.